Talk:Max Heindel

Elseware: I'm not too keen on this "rewriting for NPOV". It is not sourceryforge.org policy to have a neutral point of view. Rather to present a set of differenting views. This is *not* an encylopedia, it's a resource. A NPOV article might as well go on wikipedia, it's not what this site is about.

Writing about the occult and esoteric with a NPOV is liable to suck the life out of it.

Better to write under a sub heading your different set of views than to try and remove the personality from an article.

There can be no NPOV on sourceryforge.

--

Hi! When I stated "rewriting for NPOV" at both articles I guess it was not a correct explanation: meaning the article states a POV but I am trying to get the english to be most accurate possible (not really NPOV).

Anyway I understood it; if you think it is better to change again MPOV articles in "Rosicrucian" article (where this discussion took place) it is fine and I will also cooperate! :) NPOV demand at Wikipedia have cut an article I posted to largely loose its initial value and content (so I must agree with you at this point!).´

--Ekhalom 19:59, 25 Oct 2004 (BST)

Elseware 11:43, 26 Oct 2004 (BST): Cool. Thanks for understanding. Now there are more than one person editing on subjects which they have differing points of view. I'm keen to create a positive culture for this. Once you steer a wiki in the correct direction enough times the community starts following suit (and those who don't like it find a new place to work). Cross reference to my ideas about elementals.